Chad Comello

  • Archive
  • Book Notes
  • About
  • ← Book Notes

    The Design of Childhood: How the Material World Shapes Independent Kids

    Alexandra Lange

    |

    2018
    |
    Logged:
    2019-05
    ★★★½
    # children, creativity, design

    “To have a child is to be thrown suddenly, and I found rather miraculously, back into the world of stuff.”

    “Simple shapes and sturdy materials encourage free play and meet the child at their level.”

    In 20th century as middle class women became primary caregivers without household help, sought toys that teach

    Froebel’s first kindergarten classes (inspired by Pestalozzi) forego rote one-directional learning for children’s innate curiosity and object lessons; “touch was to lead to thought, thought to learning”

    Pestalozzi’s 4 essential elements of his educational theory: children learn best when they follow their own interests; perception is the source of all learning; children learn bear through activity (physical education); ethical and moral education come from love and trust, which first comes from mother

    As kindergartens spread and viewed as supplement rather than replacement for home child-rearing, became career path for women

    Froebel’s key contribution was to add set of standardized materials to Pestalozzi’s theories, which made it replicable

    Helped change perception of children to something other than “small, stupid people engaged in useless activity”

    Transcendentalist and early childhood education crusader Elizabeth Peabody viewed kindergarten as “commonwealth or republic of children” rather than as previous model of absolute monarchy

    Peabody enlisted printer Milton Bradley manufacturing Froebel’s original 10 wooden teaching objects (“gifts”)

    Second gift (a cube, cylinder, and sphere made of maple) became symbol of kindergarten

    Third gift eight wooden cubes, meant to tap into children’s natural tendency to take things apart; contrasted with didactic letter and number toys of the time

    Frank Lloyd Wright exposed to Froebel’s blocks early; “the virtue of all this lay in the awakening of the child-mind to the rhythmic structures in nature”

    “Interlocking building cubes” debuted at English toy fair in 1947 while LEGO founder introduced “automatic binding bricks” in 1949 in Denmark

    LEGO eventually settled with Kiddiecraft over trademark in 1980s

    LEGO’s expansion coincided with postwar booms and influenced house design to make playrooms more centralized

    Tube-and-stud design gave LEGO “clutch power” but easy to disassemble; patented in 1958

    To keep up with narrative-based toys like Playmobil, changed from “quiet construction to character-filled action”

    LEGO’s 1960s marketing tension between “creative play and realistic architecture” continues to today

⁂

Feelin’ lucky?